Methodology
Hazard Identification, Risk Identification and Rating, Control
Measures and Action Plan
(BS 8800 Model)
The purpose of this risk analysis is to obtain an idea of the
size or scale of the risk. This is to ensure that the hazards identified
are prioritised for further action to be taken. The risks that are
identified should be based on the potential severity of harm and
the likelihood that it will occur. The assessment is subjective
with little value for assigning a numeric value.
Severity of harm
The severity of harm is based on the information of the activities
and observation of the site together with:
Slightly harmful
e.g. superficial injuries; minor cuts and bruises, eye irritation
from dust; nuisance and irritation etc
Harmful
e.g. lacerations, burns, concussion, serious sprains, minor fractures,
deafness, dermatitis, asthma, work related upper limb disorders,
etc.
Extremely harmful
e.g. amputations, major fractures, poisonings, multiple injuries,
fatal injuries, occupational cancer and other life shortening diseases.
Likelihood of harm
The likelihood of harm is based on the existing controls that
are in place. Specific hazards, legal requirements, codes of practice
or guidance from the manufacturers or suppliers. The factors that
have been considered are:
-
The number of people exposed
-
The frequency and duration of the exposure to the hazard
-
Failure of the services e.g. water and electricity
-
Failure of plant and machinery components
-
Exposure to elements
-
Protection of personal protective equipment
-
Unsafe acts of persons who do not know hazards; have no knowledge
or physical capability to do work; under estimates the risks
they are exposed; take short cuts to complete the tasks, horseplay;
and under estimates the practicality & usefulness of safe
systems of work.
Guide to risk assessment
(refer to the risk rating/severity below)
The risk rating/severity tables
The table below shows the simple method, which can be used for
deciding whether the risks are tolerable. The risks are classified
according to their estimated likelihood and potential severity of
harm.
|
|
SLIGHTLY
HARMFUL |
|
HARMFUL |
|
EXTREME
HARMFUL |
| HIGHLY
UNLIKELY |
|
Trivial risk |
|
Tolerable risk |
|
Moderate risk |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| UNLIKELY |
|
Tolerable risk |
|
Moderate risk |
|
Substantial risk |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| LIKELY |
|
Moderate Risk |
|
Substantial risk |
|
Intolerable risk |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk based action and control plan table
Risk Level: Action and time scale
Trivial: No action is required and no documentary records
need to be kept.
Tolerable: No additional controls are required. Consideration
may be given to a more cost effective solution or improvement that
imposes no additional cost burden. Monitoring is required to ensure
that the controls are maintained
Moderate: Efforts should be made to reduce the risk but
the costs of prevention should be carefully measured and limited.
Risk reduction measures should be implemented within a defined time
period.
Where the moderate risk is associated with extremely harmful consequences,
further assessment may be necessary to establish more precisely
the likelihood of harm, and so any improved control measures.
Substantial: Work should not start, or stopped until the
risk has been removed or reduced. Considerable resources may also
have to be allocated to reduce the risk.
Intolerable: Work should not be started or continued until
the risk has been reduced. If it is not possible to reduce risk
even within unlimited resources the work has to remain prohibited.
|